This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
His research focuses on professional development and teacher change, programevaluation, assessment of student learning, grading and reporting, instructional effectiveness, and educational reform. Guskey, T. Get Set, Go! Creating Successful Grading and Reporting Systems.
For example, when Baule conducted a survey during his time as a superintendent in Indiana, he found only one-third of schools were assessing their one-to-one device programs. . To help administrators create effective, long-term programs, Baule outlined some best practices for technology programevaluation.
For almost a decade, selling edtech products to schools and districts has felt dangerously like selling a home over the internet. We describe edtech products with all the excitement and adjectives of a fresh listing on Zillow. Now the good news: Over the past year, we’ve seen a broader set of research practices applied to edtech.
You probably wouldn’t be surprised to hear that every education technology (edtech) publisher says their product works, and they all have some sort of supporting evidence. Highly credible edtechevaluation lists give top marks for just one RCT (randomized controlled trial). The Problem: Gold Standard EdTech Studies are Rare.
A new bar has been set for state-grants-funded digital math programsevaluation. The Utah STEM Action Center has released its 2020 annual report , which includes the results of their comprehensive statewide programevaluation. EdSurge Article Recommends Edtech Efficacy Portfolios - Here's Ours. Further Reading.
I argue that rural states are where edtech companies, investors, and media outlets should be looking to to see truly innovative implementation of technology. Today, there are 11 school districts and 7 community colleges that have utilized the grant to plant and grow courses and programs that fit their students’ needs.
Examples of districts that embed practical evidence-based analysis into their programevaluation and budget cycles include efforts such as Jefferson County Public Schools’ Cycle-based Budgeting program and Schenectady City School’s return on investment review.
Federal ProgramEvaluations and Program-Related Reports: The First-Year Implementation of the Technology Literacy Challenge Fund in Five States (American Institutes for Research, 2000). Federal ProgramEvaluations and Program-Related Reports: National Educational Technology Trends Study (NETTS).
While acknowledging that randomized controlled trials have their place in what should be an “edtech efficacy portfolio,” Andrew pointed out that the time and expense required for this type of study usually makes them feasible only once every five or ten years, limiting their ability to show progress over time and include the latest data.
Independent education research firm WestEd recently published the largest ever national study evaluating a math edtechprogram. Control schools were not filtered based on math programs being used. EdTechEvaluation Resources: ProgramEvaluation Rubric. Read the full report from WestEd.
Five PRIME Factors for EdTechEvaluation As someone who has evaluated and published findings on an edtechprogram for two decades, closely watching the marketing hype in the math edtech market in particular, I’ve come to believe something you may find shocking: All edtechprograms work.
When discussing research that evaluatesedtechprogram effectiveness, we need to talk less about access to it and more about the nature of the information itself. Traditionally, edtechevaluation has been made up of scarce data and insufficient credible information about the efficacy of its program.
Department of Education (DOE) Institute of Education Sciences (IES) as one of six math programs to be further investigated under what IES terms “replication studies.”. “We We look forward to using ST Math to help IES realize its vision of a healthier and better-informed market in education programevaluations.
Department of Education (DOE) Institute of Education Sciences (IES) as one of six math programs to be further investigated under what IES terms “replication studies.”. “We We look forward to using ST Math to help IES realize its vision of a healthier and better-informed market in education programevaluations.
leads the Marketplace Research initiative at Digital Promise which is focused on increasing the amount of evidence in the edtech marketplace. Christina Luke, Ph.D. Christina earned a Ph.D. Join the Community. Digital Promise was created with the mission to accelerate innovation in education to improve opportunities to learn.
leads the Marketplace Research initiative at Digital Promise which is focused on increasing the amount of evidence in the edtech marketplace. Christina Luke, Ph.D. Christina earned a Ph.D. Join the Community. Digital Promise was created with the mission to accelerate innovation in education to improve opportunities to learn.
Am I to follow and be held to the ISTE coaching guidelines of best practice that include: Visionary leadership Teaching, learning, and assessments Digital age learning environments Professional development and programevaluation Digital Citizenshp Content knowledge and professional growth If so, there has to be some changes.
SIGN UP : Get more news from the EdTech newsletter in your inbox every two weeks! Rafael Inoa is a Kean University lecturer with a doctorate in educational research and programevaluation. Support Teachers Through All Aspects of Tech Integration. Buying Cycle. Content Length. 300-500 words. by Rafael Inoa. by Steven LoCascio.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 34,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content