Remove E-rate Remove Program Evaluation Remove Study
article thumbnail

U.S. K-12 Educational Technology Policy: Historical Notes on the Federal Role

Doug Levin

Finally, somewhat for the sake of brevity, I have excluded consideration of the role of the E-rate (which is overseen by the Federal Communications Commission and not the U.S. Federal Program Evaluations and Program-Related Reports: National Educational Technology Trends Study (NETTS). FY 2001: $450,000,000.

Policies 150
article thumbnail

More than a Checkmark

MIND Research Institute

Savvy practitioners in the field of education should be dissatisfied with this simplistic “checkbox” approach to evaluating program effectiveness. It is time to leave behind that old checkbox mentality and adopt a more comprehensive and useful lens through which to evaluate. English learners, gifted & talented).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Ed tech companies promise results, but their claims are often based on shoddy research

The Hechinger Report

IXL says its program is “proven effective” and that research “has shown over and over that IXL produces real results.” Edgenuity boasts that the first case study in its long list of “success stories” shows how 10th grade students using its program “demonstrated more than an eightfold increase in pass rates on state math tests.”.

Company 145
article thumbnail

A lot of hope was pinned on after-school programs — now they’re shutting their doors

The Hechinger Report

Zayden Barnes, a first grader at Clara E. The lesson in engineering and self-control was part of an after-school program run by the nonprofit Horizon Education Centers. Its one of a dwindling number of after-school options in a city with one of the highest child poverty rates of any large urban area in the country. Related: $1.5

E-rate 84