Doug Levin

APRIL 21, 2016

Finally, somewhat for the sake of brevity, I have excluded consideration of the role of the E-rate (which is overseen by the Federal Communications Commission and not the U.S. Federal Program Evaluations and Program-Related Reports: National Educational Technology Trends Study (NETTS). FY 2001: $450,000,000.

Policies 150

Policies Technology Program Evaluation Education 150

MIND Research Institute

JUNE 20, 2023

Having evaluated and published findings on MIND Education’s programs for over 20 years, I can distill the essential factors that should matter to practitioners. Patterns & Repeatability P atterns & R e peatability are fundamental to establishing the reliability of any study finding.

Comparison 52

Comparison EdTech E-rate Outcomes 52

The Hechinger Report

MAY 20, 2020

Edgenuity boasts that the first case study in its long list of “success stories” shows how 10th grade students using its program “demonstrated more than an eightfold increase in pass rates on state math tests.”. The Pearson study included positive findings for third graders that the What Works did not evaluate.).

Company 145

Company Pearson E-rate Software 145

The Hechinger Report

APRIL 23, 2025

Zayden Barnes, a first grader at Clara E. The lesson in engineering and self-control was part of an after-school program run by the nonprofit Horizon Education Centers. Its one of a dwindling number of after-school options in a city with one of the highest child poverty rates of any large urban area in the country. Related: $1.5

E-rate 106

E-rate Program Evaluation Report Outcomes 106