This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Their changed view — and that of others who shunned Rogers and now want in — is driven by what seems to be a magic educational elixir: personalizedlearning. Philanthropists, state education officials, reform advocates — even charter school leaders — are examining personalizedlearning. What can that look like?
(From left to right) Sixth graders Mia DeMore, Maria DeAndrade, and Stephen Boulas make a number line in their math class at Walsh Middle School in Framingham, Massachusetts, one of 132 “Basecamp” schools piloting the PersonalizedLearning Platform created by the Summit charter school network. Photo: Chris Berdik. FRAMINGHAM, Mass.
The charter network’s New York students had scored below expectations on the new, more challenging CommonCore tests. Achievement First was responding to what co-founder Dacia Toll describes as a wake-up call in 2013.
While discussing their respective backgrounds, the two teachers wondered if there was a way to give students a deeper understanding of genocide than what was covered by the state’s instructional “frameworks” — Massachusetts’ version of the CommonCore standards. Historical documents and literary fiction make up the curriculum.
Wednesday, April 23rd at 7pm ISTE - ISTE Standards and the CommonCore Integration in Action , Are you daunted by the prospect of implementing the CommonCore State Standards? The CommonCore opens the door for innovative teaching techniques to ensure students are college and career ready.
Conley, a University of Oregon education professor who has researched both CommonCore and college readiness, explains, “It’s not just that people don’t agree on what ‘ready’ means. Or learning disabilities. But that’s too broad for policy, apparently. Or too narrow. In an article on Politico , David T. Or anxiety.
“Trump Taps Common-Core Foe Mick Zais for No. Via ProPublica : “ For-Profit Schools Get State Dollars For Dropouts Who Rarely Drop In.” “ Is Homework Compatible With PersonalizedLearning? “ No State Will Measure Social-Emotional Learning Under ESSA. 2 Post at Ed.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 34,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content